powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
Leaving the good ole US of A Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community

corvidgirl

Leaving the good ole US of A

Name: Private | Gender: Private | Member Since August 1, 2007
Current Level: All-Star | Email: Private
Favorite
Teams
Blog Home

Amendments

Posted on: April 7, 2008 6:32 pm
 

 

Constitutional Amendments...might we at sportsline do better?  I'll present the Amendments in no particular order, or...more to the point...in whatever order arbitrarily suits me.  Thusly:

Amendment 3 - Cruel and Unusual Punishment:

Excessive bail shall not be required, not excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

 


 

I will start by saying that I understand...and agree with...prohibitions against cruel punishments.  If we have not yet managed to move firmly to whatever moral high ground prohibits "burning at the stake" or "flaying alive" then we clearly lack the wherewithal to make the fine distinctions required for full appreciation of this amendment.

But what about "unusual" punishment?  Should we be confined in those ways?  Why prohibit punitive measures distinguished only by their ingenuity?  Do any of you have uncommon suggestions which would avoid the "cruelty" concerns...while still allowing some degree of creativity?

Please...try to take this seriously.  If you can't manage that...do try to be entertaining.

 

Category: General
Reputation: 99
Level: Superstar
Since: Feb 25, 2007
Posted on: April 8, 2008 1:03 pm

Amendments

Cor,

There's a judge in my area who's well-know for his creative sentencings, e.g., someone who stole a donation cannister for a homeless shelter was sentenced to spend a night on the street during wintertime.



Reputation: 88
Level: All-Star
Since: Aug 1, 2007
Posted on: April 8, 2008 1:16 pm

Amendments

My concern would be that it might be hard to ensure that sentencing is consistently applied to all convicted if judges are just dreaming up creative sentences.

A legitimate concern JD...and one I share.

I worry that we will have people branded for all kinds of "Immoral" acts in the eyes of fundamentalists.

Yes.  In formulating a system of punishment, we should be cognizant of the fact that what seems a good idea...when applied to someone else...might strike us very differently if applied to us.

I agree with the attorney that our system is too flawed to be handing out punishments that cannot be reversed--such as branding or tattoos.

Or the death penalty.